Your developers are no longer the only ones writing code. Your leadership tools must follow.
Cursor, Copilot, Devin, Claude Code. A growing share of your code is no longer written by a human. Classic leadership tools don't measure it natively — DeployIt does.
Why now
AI coding agents became serious in 2025
Cursor Composer, Copilot SWE Agent, Devin, Claude Code: all produce mergeable PRs. On some early-adopter teams, AI already signs a large share of the diff. No manager has the full view.
Your people KPIs don't know what to measure anymore
A dev merging 80% Cursor code vs a dev writing it all by hand: it's no longer the same contribution. Line/commit rankings became misleading.
Your 2022 tool stack doesn't keep up
Swarmia, LinearB, Jellyfish were built for humans alone. They count AI agents as anomalies, not as peers.
How DeployIt treats humans + AI agents on equal ground
Each agent = a measured contributor
Claude Code, Cursor, Copilot (including SWE Agent), Codex, Devin, aider, Windsurf… Each agent gets its own row: share of the work, estimated output in dev-days, quality scored on the same 5-tier scale as humans. An agent that produces 2 dev-days in a single day — you see it. No leniency.
Honest human vs AI attribution
Commit identity, PR metadata, Co-authored-by trailers (Copilot, Claude Code, Cursor). If a human commits AI code without a marker, DeployIt doesn't make it up. Zero configuration on the dev side.
Governance that alerts, never blocks
An agent PR merged without human approval gets flagged. AI share threshold per project, alert when an agent commits straight to the main branch. Read-only: DeployIt warns, it blocks nothing.
Executive reporting in plain language
"Checkout v2 delivered: 60% human, 40% Cursor" — an illustrative example of the weekly report. Weekly AI share, trend, human vs AI quality compared: the AI agents section lives in your weekly report and your board report.